this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024

8 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

5234 readers

179 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

8

ELI5 the whole Wayland vs X11 going on? (programming.dev)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by alexdeathway@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Title *X11

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

X11 is an ancient piece of crap which no one wants to update or maintain.

Wayland is the new and better display manager.

However, many old applications only support X11, because they depend on some arcane feature not yet supported by Wayland. Hence, the drama.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Also, it was easier to support X11, since there is no security. You wanted to read other applications key events, no problem. Want to read the screen, without without anyone knowing? No, problem, just read it. With Wayland you must use APIs for stuff, and you are not allowed to do everything.