this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
2029 points (98.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21025 readers
541 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 61 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I have been playing with the idea of a documentation.org. Something publicly funded (mostly through corporate and individual donations) that hosts technical manuals, white papers, guides, links to video tutorials (likely YouTube), FAQs, and even links to Discord and/or forums if they exist. Documents are public, free to index (no login to view), version controlled and held in perpetuity.

    Obviously there is much more to it, but I think we have reached a point where something like it is required.

    [–] flamingos@ukfli.uk 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Aren't you basically describing readthedocs.io?

    [–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago

    In the most technical terms, yes. The idea is not new or bizarre, but I see the same missteps repeated. For starters, the venture HAS to be a nonprofit with zero need for monetization. It will also need an inviting and easy to navigate user interface, accessible to the most nontechnical of users. You need to have a massive document library from multiple large players from day one, so you need to have a lot of contacts.

    As I said it's not fully cooked, but I have spoken to a few people that could help me make it happen and they seemed open to it.

    [–] Babbiorsetto@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 8 months ago

    First thing that comes to mind is https://devdocs.io/about

    [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

    Please consider a Patreon for doc review. I don't mean reviewing the doc against the project for fitness, as that's the job of each project to maintain and review their own docs; I mean by a technical writer who can de-localize (you only think I mean 'internationalize') the document and make it syntactically and logically correct against a generic, classic style guide.

    The rising popularity of really bad errors is definitely turning me off from videos or documentation from a few sources with a lot of churn. It ruins the flow and it robs the assumption of authority which I'd argue is an important part of any documentation.

    [–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

    That is a good idea. I am fairly certain I could get funding and/or loaned resource time for English, Spanish, French and German, but crowd funding incentivized localization for other regions is brilliant.

    [–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

    Also I'd rather just have these things in the repository.