this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
471 points (98.6% liked)

Linux

48256 readers
522 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shamelessly copied from a post on a Lemmy look alike site :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 96 points 9 months ago (23 children)

He didn't give up his fortune directly, because today he is a rich man. He just enriched with a different approach like opting to not lock the source code of his work like another guy we know well...

But I like him anyway

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 9 points 9 months ago (9 children)

opting to not lock the source code of his work like another guy we know well...

I'm out of the loop, who are you referring to?

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ahh, I thought it was somebody else you were talking about since DOS was never open source

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was about ms basic at the time I believe.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, so they had an open source product back then?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, but they were very adamantly against the sharing of ms basic which was their big product (before dos), at a time when software sharing was fairly common.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago

Oh ok, makes sense.
Funnily enough, it seems they decided to make it open source about 40 years later

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)