this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)
Astronomy
4034 readers
2 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Good question. According to this article, the process going on with Betelgeuse does sound like the same or very similar to the process described in OP's article.
OP's article doesn't say that the Old Smokers they found are red super-giants but since they called them old smokers, I'm inclined to think that they are. Also because they say that smoke contains much higher levels of heavy elements than is common in the region which would also be consistent with older stars. The article doesn't say whether or not the stars puff out smoke on a regular schedule like Betelgeuse does, but then maybe they haven't been watching them long enough to see a pattern yet.
It does seem like they found a bunch of older stars that are pre-supernova, just like Betelgeuse is, and burping out clouds of gas and dust.
I missed it at first as well. The second paragraph implies they are red giants. However, there is a distinction between a red giant and a red super-giant, if that is what you mean.
Ah, yes, I missed that. Thank you.
Awesome! Thanks for contacting the professor and posting the reply.
Of course! I was super curious myself.
Teachers generally want to teach so I have had great success reaching out to various people like that.
I don't abuse that, of course. Keeping questions short and being respectful of their time is a huge plus, in my experience.
So, in my typical nature, I went right to the source and shot off an email to Professor Philip Lucas from the University of Hertfordshire. He was one of the primary researchers for the original paper. (P.W. Lucas et al.)
If he responds, I'll post it here.