this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
439 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Doctrow argues that nascent tech unionization (which we're closer to having now than ever before) combined with bipartisan fear (and consequent regulation) either directly or via agencies like the FTC and FCC can help to curb Big Tech's power, and the enshittification that it has wrought.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

We need to get rid of the notion that corporations first have a responsibility to the shareholders. The shareholders should be last, after the employees, the customers, and the safety of the general public.

[–] le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

But that's not how capitalism works. The employees, customers and general public don't invest any money in companies. Without money, no business.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The employees invest their time and time is money. The customers invest their money and their trust. The general public invests their tax dollars to create the infrastructure needed for the company to even exist in the first place.

And don’t tell me the employees get compensated for their time, because they create more value than they receive, hence, profits.

The shareholders, literally only invest money. They give the least and get the most.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait are you talking about caring about the workers? Hm... Idk... Sounds like communism to me 😠

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Communism is not "caring about workers". If you read what Lenin thought of NEP, he agreed that it was in fact better for workers, but ideological impurity of that system was more important, and the reason it was kept for a while was that without some economy there'd simply be no new state after the civil war. While for Trotsky even that wasn't a good reason.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I was making a joke about right-wingers calling every slightly social, pro-labor, feminist, or anti-racist policy (basically anything that isn't taxes for the rich) "communist".

They even called Biden a communist 🤦

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 1 points 9 months ago

Lmao take it easy rottingleaf.

[–] le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The employees invest their time and time is money. The customers invest their money and their trust. The general public invests their tax dollars to create the infrastructure needed for the company to even exist in the first place.

Yes but it is nothing comparable to millions or billions of € invested by shareholder. Sure customer invest their trust and money but they get benefit immediately, aka the product. General public invest their tax for the infrastructure however companies get taxed too for the infrastructure that benefits general public, that's a null equation. Investor are a necessary part of the economy and shall be treated as such, nothing prevent government from taxing more benefits from investment tho.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I didn’t say they weren’t important or necessary. I said they were the least important, and I stand by that. Name one single company that doesn’t have employees or customers, or exists outside of a government. I can name several companies without outside investors.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

That is indeed was how capitalism worked before Jack Welch changed business culture to be all about shareholder value. Before him companies focused on employees. They bragged about how many employees they had. They bragged about not laying off any employees in the Great Depression.

And the biggest economic problem we have is too much investment. Companies are now competing to get investment dollars instead of competing to make good products to make revenue. Too many resources are devoted to marketing and hoarding data because being a data-driven company will attract more investment from billionaires that are hoarding wealth. Productivity numbers have been rising as it always has since the industrial revolution. But productivity is being devoted towards activities which only serve to attract investment but doesn't provide any real world value. Because of this, quality life has been decreasing even while productivity is increasing.

The rich have too much money and it's hurting capitalism.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

Without customers, also no business.

Without employees, also no business.

You can technically have a business without the safety of the general public, but which society wants that?

So why do the shareholders get extra privilege?