this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
52 points (89.4% liked)

Programming

21831 readers
586 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are so many definitions of OOP out there, varying between different books, documentation and articles.

What really defines OOP?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyon@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Once upon a time, “big data” was datasets large enough that it was impractical to try to store or work with them in a traditional relational database software. Which is where distributed structures came into play with the ability to spread both storage and computation across clusters of machines, using solutions like Hadoop and MongoDB. That seemed to be the direction things were heading 10 - 15 years ago.

However, with the automated scaling built into modern cloud databases, the line has gotten a bit blurry; Snowflake, Redshift, BigQuery all handle many billions of rows just fine. I probably wouldn’t use the term big data in a professional context these days, but there is a table size after which I write code a bit more carefully.

I suppose my point is that the term once meant something, but marketing stole it because it sounds cool. I worked in a tech shop in the late aughts where the sales team insisted on calling every rack mounted server a “blade server”, regardless of whether it had modular swappable boards. Because it sounded cool.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

datasets large enough that it was impractical to try to store or work with them in a traditional relational database software

How I remember it is that it's not even the whole dataset that is too large, but the individual records. Hadoop for example is not doing anything magic, it's just a software package to extend MySQL to be able to efficiently have pictures (Facebook's original use case, of course it evolved) as records.

I guess big data is what you need it to justify what you want to justify. In one of my gigs' case, it was public funding for a project.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

That's all of CS and IT.