this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
290 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 22 points 9 months ago (15 children)

People now "ChatGPT isn't real AI because it says dumb shit all the time". People then: "Prolog is AI because it can solve logic problems".

Something with moving goalposts or something

[–] Helix@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

yeah, they're really in the wrong to think that we'd have some technical advancement within the last 40 years and we should expect more than a probabilistic text generator. 🙃

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Helix@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I know how ML works, my comment was a persiflage on over-simplifying the topic of AI and logic. I originally marked it with an /s to indicate sarcasm, but I think this gets lost with newer generations, so now I replaced the /s with the upside down emoji (🙃) which also seems to indicate sarcasm.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago

Is /s way older than I thought it was?

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No need to %s/\/s/🙃/g on my account... but the comment is ambiguous either way, and I think that video is pretty decent, so... 🤹

load more comments (13 replies)