this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
609 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We will need small and independent commercial providers for the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I wonder if it'd be feasible to get local governments to fund instances of these platforms as a sort of public square 🤔 It's a total fever dream, but would be really interesting to see!

[–] rglullis 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

A quick test for cases where you might think "the Goverment" should be involved: do you think it would be a good idea regardless of who is in power? If you are in the US, would you like to have an instance where Trump accolades are moderators? If you are in Turkey, would you feel comfortable joining a community controlled by Erdogan?

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Local governments, so the city. Or even coming out of a local fund to a third party entity who handles administration and moderation. Moderation should be established and guided by third party audits of this entity.

I don't think the government should have a direct hand in deciding the moderation guidelines, but should leave this to other entities, preferably non-profits and cooperatives.

Granted I'm just spitballing here, don't hold me to the fire over this lol

[–] ASCIIansi@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't help but think that the censorship would be way way worse if local governments were hosting. Not to mention that they would be most likely to require having people's true identities when creating accounts.

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm simply suggesting it as an option, not as the entire thing. Nothing would stop people from having their own instances, and as far as the local governments front, they would likely each have their own criteria for joining, if any.

This is the only way I could realistically see an actual "public square of the internet"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)