this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
825 points (97.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
99 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    825
    Here we go (lemmy.ml)
    submitted 9 months ago by Samsy@lemmy.ml to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    172 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    Source: https://github.com/OpenStatsLab/statcounterdata/blob/5c0460384f14a198d5a6614beccd1c866c17c1db/parsed/os/desktop.json#L1481:

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] evranch@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    That doesn't sound too different from the regular Unix paradigm where all your config is stored in your home directory. I've wiped my root partition many times over the last decade but usually everything in my desktop environment is just the same as it was. Aside from migration of dotfiles into .config which was honestly overdue.

    Unless NixOS is kind of like Ansible and is a build script for the whole system, package management and all? Haven't tried it myself.

    My concern would be slow buildup of unused packages if that's the case. It's nice to wipe out that junk on an upgrade.

    [–] currycourier@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

    I haven't used Ansible but it sounds pretty much like that, basically you write out all the packages you want in a config and it builds the system from that. Very nice in terms of stability and maintainability. I'm very much an amateur so I can't say for sure but I think the unused package issue would still exist on nix.

    [–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 2 points 9 months ago

    Exactly, like ansible.

    Unused packages aren't typically a problem unless you imperatively change your systems state. Otherwise, If you remove it from your configuration.nix, it's removed when you switch to your next build. Previous builds/generations keep those versions of those packages, which wastes space, but you can specify garbage collection to remove generations older than a month

    My only complaint so far is the best way to properly make a development shell for a python project is either with a still somewhat experimental feature called flakes, or a 3rd party solution poetry2nix. Im probably going to switch to using docker/podman for python projects.

    On the other hand, pip is the worst package manager, so being incentivized away from it is kind of a plus