Science

13014 readers

64 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 9 months ago by paddythegeek@lemmy.ca to c/science@beehaw.org

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I didn’t need proof myself, but I suppose it’s comforting nevertheless to have it mathematically confirmed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hakase@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

To provide a dissenting opinion, I've always preferred harpsichords to pianos, which is one of the reasons I love Bach so much.

Pianos somehow sound simultaneously harsher than harpsichords with the off-putting initial clunk of the keys, and boringly muted in comparison.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

Harpsichord always seems so frilly and thin. Piano has more depth and range of emotion, more dynamics.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago

I do love a lot of his music. It’s just difficult to hear the shrill of the harpsichord, for me.