this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
100 points (91.0% liked)

Linux

48208 readers
1640 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] intrepid@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Flatpaks aren't the cause of the fact that different applications don't function correctly with different versions of libraries

This problem has been solved by Nix and Guix. Nix is as popular among developers as flatpak is. Add bubblewrap to all applications, and you get nearly all the features as flatpaks. Flatpaks, meanwhile are huge and a bit slow to start - problems that Nix and Guix don't suffer from.

I do use flatpaks extensively. But they are probably not the best solution to the problems you mention.>

[–] sudneo@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tbh, for me the value of flatpak is in the isolation (great for how easy it is to achieve), rather than the compatibility.

For example, I run obsidian with no network access and fs access to just the path where my notes are stored. This is really reassuring considering I am not really sure what all the plugins might do. While it is not perfect, it's much better than having it running natively in my box (I.e. root namespaces).

[–] intrepid@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isolation is easy to achieve. Flatpak's sandboxing layer is bubblewrap. It's an independent software. It wouldn't be too hard to write a wrapper for bubblewrap that acts like flatpak and launches applications in a carefully constructed sandbox.

[–] sudneo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's also not too hard to cook a Dockerfile for it, or even write a systemd wrapper with security settings. However, with flatpak you get this out of the box and mostly in a transparent way, plus you get all the usually annoying aspects (like having GUI applications work in containers) taken care of.