this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
310 points (86.6% liked)

Privacy

31991 readers
454 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt text: an ad for Github Copilot when viewing files in a github repo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Codeberg only allows open source licensed code. If you’re working on non-free software you could self host Codeberg’s underlying software, or SourceHut is a different but other good option too.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

In what circumstances would you develop non-free code and still have the need to pick a provider? Don't companies have regulations usually, so your have to use either their own hosted instance or GitHub enterprise?

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I use GitHub private repos for my home configuration stuff. So it's not open source since I'm the only one using it and I don't want someone else to know how to attack my network.

For certain configurations, self hosting doesn't make sense. For people like me, who would rather spend his time doing the stuff I care about instead of maintaining the stuff I don't care about, I'm okay giving Microsoft some "control" over my code for the convenience.

That said, I am thinking about moving my FOSS code off of GitHub since that is an option. I'd have to see their CI/CD pipelines though.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Just FYI, you can keep personal repositories for configurations and whatnot on Codeberg, check out the FAQ: https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#can-i-host-personal%2C-private-repositories-that-i-do-not-intend-to-publish%3F

I'd have to see their CI/CD pipelines though.

~~Codeberg hasn't deployed their Actions yet, but the software Gitea and Forgejo both have it, so I believe it will come some time in the near future (don't know how near though, could probably ask them over on @Codeberg).~~

EDIT: not completely true, actions have been ready for a while apparently, but you currently have to provide your own compute: https://docs.codeberg.org/ci/actions/
Which isn't ideal, though

In the meantime you can either use Woodpecker or use another forge like Gitea hosted (has Actions already) or Gitlab with their CI/CD

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't appear that you are allowed to host personal code projects though.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago

Of course not, that's the point. I don't know what their stance on little toy projects kept for yourself is if that's what you're asking

[–] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

i work for some people who don't host their own gitlab/gitea/whatever and use the paid tier from github or gitlab. they could not use codeberg.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago

That's what I said, they use paid GitHub, so you as the worker don't get the choice, you need to use whatever they do

Meanwhile, if you start your own project, you need to choose a platform, but you also need to choose a license, so nothing is stopping you from using a free licence and picking Codeberg

I struggle to see many cases where someone that cares about FOSS gets to choose between GitHub, Codeberg etc, but doesn't get to choose the license of their project. As an employee you get neither, for your own projects you get both.