this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
191 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59269 readers
4068 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
191
AI Companies Take Hit as Judge Says Artists Have “Public Interest” In Pursuing Lawsuits (www.hollywoodreporter.com)
submitted 9 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A federal judge rejected arguments from Stability AI, Midjourney and DeviantArt that the suit is intended to suppress its free speech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If an AI tool helps your output by doing something intelligent for you that "enhances" the work but you didn't do the part the AI did - the AI doing something intelligent was a substitute for you doing something intelligent.

In the minimal a single skill loss is not significant to you producing output, but in the maximal none of your human skill is needed. AI will think of better prompts than you, or artists, to make cool art.