this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
815 points (98.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
136 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    815
    classic opsec mistake (discuss.tchncs.de)
    submitted 9 months ago by lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/10692187

    so, the company was Vastaamo. was because it got bankrupt after the breach, and GDPR violations.

    the "hacker"(or rather cracker) was extradited from France to Finland.
    you can read about how terrible the company's security was here: https://tietosuoja.fi/en/-/administrative-fine-imposed-on-psychotherapy-centre-vastaamo-for-data-protection-violations

    or watch mental outlaw's video on the matter, or the Wikipedia article on the breach.

    now there are several things that shouldn't have happened (e.g.: don't do these things on your main OS, have root access disabled, etc.), but I'll leave that to you experts.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    CEO got a 3-month suspended sentence

    [–] breakcore@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 9 months ago

    Not even remotely enough

    [–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

    That's a start, but on its own pretty meaningless. A suspended sentence means he does not go to prison, so long as he behaves himself for a year or however long.

    The article doesn't go into it, but I hope he was also fined heavily. All we have is "the court determined it could not be resolve through fines, a prison sentence is warranted".

    [–] venia_sil@fedia.io 2 points 9 months ago

    See? CEOs get criminal liabilities! Capitalism works!

    (/s alas)