this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
88 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

7134 readers
371 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories

πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions

πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

πŸ’» Universities

πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping

πŸ—£οΈ Politics

🍁 Social & Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
88
Should lying in the House of Commons be punished? (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As our government becomes more and more polarized, what can we do to ensure that facts and data hold out?

I'm not suggesting that lying should be illegal (in fact, it's often unintentional), but when an MPs statement can later be proven to be false, shouldn't they be forced to publicly apologize?

The truth shouldn't be political.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not an admission of intent, but an admission of fact: that your statement was false.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It became false once more data became available.. How do you deal with that, when you need to deal with a situation with partial information?

It's not like they meant to lie about it, then had to make a decision and you can't always make the right choice when you're missing data.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Hey, that's fine.

"We did the best with what we had and we now know that to have been the wrong decision"

But again, decisions aren't facts. Misrepresenting facts should be decoupled from the resulting decision.