this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
676 points (96.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21273 readers
1482 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    676
    Windows dropped new feature called "sudo" (feddit.de)
    submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Titou@feddit.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    I don't think i need to explain how it works, should i ?

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    I would probably list out a series of symptoms of large businesses that don't qualify for my non-corporate license.

    • The company itself, its owners, executives, board members, employees or any other persons associated with the company has spent more than $100 on lobbying since the invention of the written word. To include a middle manager that worked for the company for 2 weeks, quit, and then later went on to become involved in lobbying.
    • Any executive, board member, manager or such person currently or has ever had a contract that features any clauses that could be described as a "golden parachute."
    • The company has ever engaged in anti-union activity.
    • The company has ever outsourced jobs overseas because labor in developing countries is cheaper. Hiring outside one's home country seeking better expertise ie "We contracted with a German machine shop because the sample work they turned in was of better quality" is okay; "We only have to pay Vietnamese teenagers 40 cents a day" isn't.
    • The company publicly trades stock. That is to say random people mostly stock brokers and banks that don't actually generate any value for society pays a little money and then expects dividents in perpetuity like ticks getting fat and bloated with the blood of higher life forms. These people may not financially benefit from my work more than I do.
    • The highest paid person who is in any way on the payroll of the company is paid more than 20 times the lowest paid employee.

    That's probably a good start.

    [–] eatham@aussie.zone 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    That's a pretty good list. I would say for 1 and 4 it should be in the past 50 years, to allow for companies to change. I would also add that anything the parent company or a company owned by the parent company that violates these rules also counts. Also, what is a "golden parachute"

    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    A "golden parachute" is basically a clause in the contract of a CEO or other higher up where the company agrees to pay severance benefits. I don't have a problem with severance pay in general but some of these things are basically "No matter how much I embezzle and defraud, no matter how many people I kill, no matter how much damage I do, I get tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, to the degree of actually incentivizing getting hired and fired as much as possible.

    [–] eatham@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    That's pretty stupid.