this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
409 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59323 readers
4559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
409
FCC gets tough: Telcos must now tell you when your personal info is stolen | Yep, cell carriers didn’t have to do this before (www.theregister.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

FCC gets tough: Telcos must now tell you when your personal info is stolen | Yep, cell carriers didn’t have to do this before::Yep, cell carriers didn't have to do this before

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What poorly thought out language. First they call FCC "tough", then they go on to imply that it's surprising that this wasn't a requirement before. IMO "tough" would be something that exceeds ordinary expectations.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed. Cloudflare level of transparency should really be the minimum in cases of security breaches for all companies with any user/customer information. And when found to be purposefully hiding that information you should have your right to do business at least suspended in the US.

A policy as such would -

  1. Incentives disclosure (or your essentially DOA in US)
  2. Increase the IT budget and force more security over profit (because again the alternative is no profit otherwise - or at least many detailed explanations on how the company still isn't doing anything)

EDIT - spelling/autocorrect battle

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

They should do this. Still they’ll pass that cost on to the customer.