this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
26 points (79.5% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

10678 readers
425 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll busmittions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissure Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"
01-24 Film "Section 31"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halm@leminal.space 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Even the Romulan-heavy Star Trek: Picard Season 1 avoided addressing or explaining the supernova in any detail.

Explaining? Stars go supernova occasionally, there's your explanation. There doesn't need to be further cause or intervention behind it.

IMO this is a solution (or really several) looking for a problem that just doesn't exist. As it stands and despite fan speculation, Romulus was destroyed by a natural disaster, which is actually something that happens on Earth and in the wider universe.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Stars go supernova occasionally

Not spontaneously, with only a handful of years' notice, they don't.

I'm all for Trek science being a little weird, but it seems very likely that there was some funny business going on for the star to suddenly blow up and threaten the entire galaxy.

[–] e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, with Star Trek-level technology, you should be able to tell to the week when a star will nova about 10,000 years in advance.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

The wiggle room within Star Trek is that the Tkon Empire was supposedly wiped out by a supernova despite being a highly advanced civilization, and in "Second Sight" the DS9 crew boosts the top speed of a ship to warp 9.5, which suggests that a supernova can have superliminal consequences.

But there's nothing to suggest the Tkon supernova was a natural phenomenon, and the hijinks they were up to in "Second Sight" certainly wasn't.

[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Explaining? Stars go supernova occasionally, there’s your explanation. There doesn’t need to be further cause or intervention behind it.

Stars don't just randomly supernova. Stars have extremely predictable lifecycles. It's hard to believe a warp-capable species never made it past a 19th century understanding of how their sun works, especially given how fundamental the underlying principles are to our own ability to observe and understand the universe.

It's a plot hole in ST '09, though I agree that maybe it is best ignored unless they can come up with a truly compelling explanation.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Especially since 2009 had it not be the romulan star, but one near enough for the shockwave to tank Romulus

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's from tie-in material, not the film itself.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

From the script:

SPOCK PRIME: (voice-over) That is where I'm from, Jim. The future. The star went supernova...

SPOCK PRIME: (voice-over) ...consuming everything in its path. I promised the Romulans that I would save their planet...

If the sun in question was the Romulan star, then turning it into a black hole to contain the explosion would not save the planet.

Killing the star would not save their planet.

Anything involving Romulus' star means that 'saving the planet' is completely impossible.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I agree that that part of the dialogue is problematic. However, "Picard" definitively stated that it was the Romulan star.

[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

Anything involving Romulus’ star means that ‘saving the planet’ is completely impossible.

Eventually, yes, but if it were possible to collapse the exploding star in a way that didn't totally roast the planet it would buy a fair bit of time to continue the evacuation. It'll get very cold and photosynthesis will stop, but with enough power and food, the population could hang on for several years if needed.