this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
727 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

31872 readers
545 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Actors who are asking me to add some tracking code are mostly interested in reselling users' data," Anashkin said. "Actors who want to purchase it outright will stuff it with malware depending on their level of greed: hijacking affiliate links, tampering with search results, showing popups with shady websites, etc."

Anashkin's experience appears to be fairly common. Developers have discussed these solicitations in online forums and several have written blog posts about selling extensions or partnership offers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The trick is to sell it at a high price and immediately fork. Get paid and fuck off.

Then do it again and again and again. Infinite money glitch. Don't worry about getting sued after a bit you'll be rich enough to be immune from prosecution.

[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sell contract would probably include a full license transfer of all copyright, and probably a non-compete clause.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How'd uBlock (Origin) get around that?

[–] yeeliberto@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

It was a main branch overtake. Not a sellout. He was kicked put of his project.

[–] natanael@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Not all transfers include "non competes"