this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
790 points (98.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
781 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    Good that you mention it! Is there a tool that helps me list all of the open source tools I use and divide a fixed donation (say 1% of my income) between them?

    That could even be further improved by keeping usage statistics of the software I run.

    That way I‘d probably support my OS the most but the more useful stuff would also get more donations.

    If that spread, income streams would steadily increase.

    Edit: now another idea came to me. How about a pact like the fedi pacts for behaving a certain way? Just with donating 1% of income/profit to open source projects you use. That could become a trend and probably change open source A LOT.

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The problem is always how you divide, particularly for libraries. It is hard to rightly estimate. For better or for worse, we should have a union of open source developers and they should divide it up. Just pay the union and they will share that democratically amongst themselves, deciding their own criterias, sorting out edge cases, having a way to process disagreements, etc

    [–] onion@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    So like the wikimedia or openstreetmap foundations?

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 8 months ago

    For all I care the FSF could handle this actually

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Thats an insane idea! Where can I sign up? Please make a post about it!

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    It's not as simple as having an idea. Everyone can have great ideas, the problem is getting everyone on board and figuring everything else out. I'm not a FOSS dev so I don't have a foot in the community to pitch that. Don't mean to shut you down but it is probably more complicated than I made it out to be, otherwise it would probably exist in some shape

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Thanks for mentioning its not your intent to shut me down. The issue we have isnt lack of people getting on board but every idea having millions of different people pulling them in different directions.

    Example: I filed a complaint against apple for privacy violations. Seems like nobody else did it in this particular case and thats despite millions of people using their devices and being affected by this thing, even talking about it on reddit and here.

    The problem really isnt getting people on board, it is pushing for stuff to become reality.

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    In this case, there are many stakeholders involved. Volunteers, developers on corporate payroll, etc. That alone adds complexity to any solution. Doesn't men no solution can be found, but adds to the inertia since it requires more effort

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    I agree. But thats also why I think its best to push as far as one can and hope for others to join or take over once the original person/people are out of steam. This works with founding companies, groups and other movements. This ultimately leads me back to my initial: please make a post, I‘ll join you. Does it make more sense now?

    [–] GroundPlane@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    You mean make a post on Lemmy? For me the root problem is still here: I have no contacts in the (admittedly extremely wide) industry and could not build a platform for people to register their projects to. I can only draw the outline of how this thing would work

    Edit: I'll try to write something down and make a post somewhere. Any community suggestions?

    [–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 8 months ago

    Which is no problem. Causes dont need the most connected, born leader types. They need to start somewhere is all. If its meant to be, it will grow. Everything else is perfectionism imo.

    Depending on the spin, its either interesting for the fediverse, opensource or something else. You can hit me up in dms with a draft if you want.

    [–] lemmeee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

    Please post it in /c/freesoftware@lemmy.zip.

    [–] lemmeee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

    I think everyone does this manually or using recurrent donations like LiberaPay.