this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

AskBeehaw

2002 readers
2 users here now

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.

Subcommunity of Chat

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
thrawn21@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
UngodlyAudrey@beehaw.org
31
Beehaw, what is your opinion on right of nature laws, which recognize natural entities as having "personhood" or legal rights comparable to humans? (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/askbeehaw@beehaw.org
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

practical examples of this, if you're curious, include the Tūtohu Whakatupua (which declared the Whanganui River and tributaries as a legal entity), the agreement around Mount Taranaki (which grants it legal personhood), and the invalidated Lake Erie Bill of Rights (passed by Toledo, OH and was designed to allow residents to bring lawsuits on behalf of Lake Erie to protect it)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

When you get down to it, law, society, what have you, exists for the purpose of making things better for people that could be overlooked or trampled otherwise. Granting legal personhood to nature achieves that in a number of way