this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
39 points (88.2% liked)

Canada

10142 readers
723 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"This has become probably the most important both economic and political problem facing the country right now," said Tyler Meredith, a former head of economic strategy and planning for Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland.

"And especially given the significant emphasis the government has put on immigration and the relationship between immigration and the housing market, there is a need to do more."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Except my concrete asset is worth negative hundreds of thousands on paper, it’s mortgaged, and it took me near a decade to build up to save enough to buy a home.

And it’s tautologically true someone who could afford a down payment is in a better financial spot than someone who couldn’t. I don’t see the point of a comparison of who’s got it worse, the answer is always people without the ability to save.

My point is there are more than just renters who are getting squeezed right now, we need to properly manage the situation instead of renters blaming honest homeowners while the banks just looked away and let shitty slumlords overleverage themselves and the provincial governments gave them free reign to cover their losses by gouging renters infinitely.

[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Except my concrete asset is worth negative hundreds of thousands

Did your house burn down and you didn't have insurance to rebuild or how the hell did you manage that? The market has softened a little, but not that much. Well, maybe if it was a $30,000,000 home?

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

I don’t see the point of a comparison of who’s got it worse, the answer is always people without the ability to save.

Saying the liberals are in a tough spot because they have to choose between helping renters who have no assets and owners who have hundreds of thousands is obviously going to raise a comparison.

It doesn't seem like a tough choice from where I'm standing. People like you will recover over time. But people who don't own homes have nothing to recover. So it's pretty obvious who needs the help.