this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
90 points (100.0% liked)
Gaming
30428 readers
340 users here now
From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!
Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.
See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've had a similar experience with a lot of early-access games. They always end up disappointing, and I've come to realize it's because the fun comes not just from playing the game and watching it develop and improve but also in equal part from expectations. It's easy to look at an unfinished game and imagine what it could be in the future, and those fantasies inevitably exceed what is actually feasible to put into the game. I try to steer clear of early-access games now.
I don't mind early access, but in also not tripping over myself to play them.
If the game is fun as it stands, then awesome. Anything extra is the cherry on top.
If the game feels half baked and like it's missing all sorts of stuff, then naw. A game like that is just abusing it's early access status. Trying to sell itself on the promise of what's to come.
What about games that become less fun as their development goes along? That's another thing I've noticed with some early-access games whose early versions were more... concentrated, for lack of a better term. If there's progression involved, it tends to go pretty quickly in early versions. Development then doesn't change how the game plays or where the progression begins and ends, instead it just adds padding between the fun bits and makes everything take longer. Ever encounter a game like that?