this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
269 points (97.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54443 readers
222 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
269
Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu (overkill.wtf)
submitted 8 months ago by Ninjazzon@infosec.pub to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
85 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

New documents filed Monday, February 26 reveal that videogame giant Nintendo is taking action against the creators of the popular emulator tool Yuzu.

The copyright infringement filing, from Nintendo of America, states that the Yuzu tool (from developer Tropic Haze LLC) illegally circumvents the software encryption and copyright protection systems of Nintendo Switch titles, and thus facilitates piracy and infringes copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Nintendo alleges that Tropic Haze's free Yuzu emulator tool unlawfully allows pirated Switch games to be played on PCs and other devices, bypassing Nintendo's protection measures.

The official Yuzu website suggests that the tool is to be used with software you yourself own: "You are legally required to dump your games from your Nintendo Switch" — but it's common knowledge, that this is not how these tools are primarily used.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 71 points 8 months ago (3 children)

They should go one step further and ban the programming language as well the emulator was created in. That will show them!

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I say we ban technology.

[–] Wootz@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

What about a technology permit, so you're only allowed to develop technologized products if you get a permit from the Ministry of Proprietary Technology.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 16 points 8 months ago

Great idea comrade, glory to Arstotzka!

[–] UmbraTemporis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago

Big Brother is developing

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 8 months ago

So like copyrights and patents?

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

This may surprise you but Nintendo no think Industrial Revolution good for humanity.

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] ponchow8NC@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 8 months ago

Why stop there? Just ban everything that isn't Nintendo. That'll give em the old 1-2

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The EU's AI Act isn't far from this really. Regulating the development of AI so much, it'd be like if they regulated compilers to stop GNU back in the day.