this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
157 points (99.4% liked)

Linux Gaming

15292 readers
116 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
monolalia@lemmy.world
157
AMD HDMI2.1 proposal rejected by HDMI forum (gitlab.freedesktop.org)
submitted 8 months ago by Atemu@lemmy.ml to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/12544593

Alex Deucher:

The HDMI Forum has rejected our proposal unfortunately. At this time an open source HDMI 2.1 implementation is not possible without running afoul of the HDMI Forum requirements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If I was AMD I'd tell them to suck my ass and reverse engineer that shit anyway. Unfortunately I'm not AMD, lol.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They don't need to RE it; they have access to the full spec and everything for their Windows drivers anyways. They'd open themselves up for litigation if they implemented this behind the forum's back though and that's something AMD (understandably) simply won't do.

[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They could hire dedicated teams that don't have access to the full spec to RE it and it should be above board, as long as it's done right ofc.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, they can't. AMD is a member of the HDMI forum, which means they're contractually obligated to follow the forum's rules. In exchange, they get voting rights on decisions like this one, the right to propose changes to the HDMI standards, technical details that are protected by NDAs, etc. They wouldn't throw that all away and open themselves up to a lawsuit just for their OSS drivers.

[–] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Is there a specific contractual obligation stating that they can't hire teams whom have no access to NDA protected specs to RE HDMI products through the usual legal means? If not, then they should be well within their legal rights, tho it'd be worth consulting a lawyer first. Now, would it damage their relationship with the HDMI people? maybe, likely.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

Their contacts are most likely protected by NDAs, but they're also written by lawyers who know how to close loopholes. There's no way a SIG like the HDMI forum would allow members to release compatible products without following the rules.

Even if it isn't covered by the contract, the other members could hold a vote to remove AMD from the forum.