Steam Deck

14850 readers

105 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Follow the rules of Sopuli
Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
No piracy, there are other communities for that.
Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
Have fun.

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Moxvallix@sopuli.xyz

timi@lemmy.world

RolAIDS05@lemmy.world

Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz

RolAIDS05@sopuli.xyz

codus@leby.dev

[Help, Resolved] Euro Truck Simulator 2 is not running full speed on Steam Deck. (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am aiming at 60 FPS, but I am struggling to keep it at any settings.

I have performance UI brought up, and I have noticed this. Presets:

Ultra -> ~30FPS average, 90% GPU usage, 40% CPU, 65°C
High -> ~45FPS average, 80% GPU usage, 30% CPU, 60°C
Medium -> ~50FPS average, 40% GPU usage, 30% CPU, 50°C
Low -> ~50FPS average, 20% GPU usage, 20% CPU, 40°C

As you can see, I cannot reach 60 FPS in-game even at the lowest preset.

What can I check/do in this case? The Linux binary is being used.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The fact that it's OpenGL matters little. It is a misconception that Vulkan is faster. But in this case, their implementation does seem slower.

[–] hydroel@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it true specifically on Windows, because the Windows implementation of OpenGL is lacking, but false on Linux?

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Windows integrates only very early versions of OpenGL (just kept from the 9x releases). Any modern release is implemented by the driver of your 3D accellerator/video card.

OpenGL on Windows has always been kinda of a disaster (NVIDIA's a little less, but AMD and Intel's are just abysmal), DirectX support being more developed is night and day.

Linux is pretty much OpenGL's home. But a lot of applications just are not optimized well enough to show it. Vulkan being faster is just because the software using it have cleaner codebases for being newer.