this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
753 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

60056 readers
4010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
753
The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com)
submitted 9 months ago by smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.

[โ€“] zarenki@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.