this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
753 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
753
The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com)
submitted 8 months ago by smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As already mentioned, DisplayPort exists. The problem is adoption. Even getting DisplayPort adopted as the de facto standard for PC monitors hasn't done anything to get it built into TVs.

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

also there's still no alternative to hdmi-cec

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

DisplayPort supports CEC.

From Wikipedia:

The DisplayPort AUX channel is a half-duplex (bidirectional) data channel used for miscellaneous additional data beyond video and audio, such as EDID (I2C) or CEC commands.

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

huh didn't know. does it work in practice tho?