this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
92 points (93.4% liked)

Games

31812 readers
1621 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yes but not at this kind of modern graphics level.

I'm assuming that is the reason but not sure.... Maybe it's just picking the easy route also.

[–] aksdb@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Tribes (2) was pretty high end back then too. We shouldn't be taking steps back.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If your game relies on matchmaking, more players makes that problem way harder to solve. The best way to reduce queue times is to reduce players.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago

I would have thought that more users made it easier to find a match? Can you elaborate?