this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
165 points (92.7% liked)

News

23296 readers
5094 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
165
Minnesota Dems Push to Repeal School Ban on Restraint That Killed George Floyd (www.the74million.org)
submitted 8 months ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Nearly four years after George Floyd suffocated to death while being pinned face down to the pavement by a police officer, Minnesota Democrats are fast-tracking legislation that would undo a less-than-year-old ban prohibiting school-based cops from using that same type of restraint on students.

As early as Monday, the state’s House of Representatives is slated to consider a proposal that presents a drastic departure from provisions approved by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz — rules that explicitly barred school resource officers from using face-down “prone restraint.”

The ban was part of a broader police reform movement that followed Floyd’s murder. The fatal physical hold led to the largest civil rights protest in U.S. history, a national reckoning on racism, policy reforms that sought to address police brutality and, in Minneapolis and dozens of districts nationwide, the removal of sworn officers from school campuses. In Minnesota, new state rules barred police officers from using chokeholds on people and prone restraints were banned in the state’s prisons.

Now, as the state’s Democrats make a 180-degree turn on the campus reform, education equity advocates have accused state leaders of falling to the political pressure of law enforcement groups ahead of a November election where party lawmakers seek to maintain their narrow majority in the state House. The proposal cleared the House Ways and Means committee earlier this week.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240304131847/https://www.the74million.org/article/minnesota-dems-push-to-repeal-school-ban-on-restraint-that-killed-george-floyd/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 36 points 8 months ago (5 children)

The article doesn’t say who introduced this repeal. It just says “the democrats,” which sounds like right wing rhetoric. Does anyone have a name?

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The other person provided the name, here is Bonnie Westland's reasoning:

During a recent Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee hearing, Democratic Sen. Bonnie Westlin, lead sponsor of the Senate version of the bill that would restore prone restraints in schools, presented it less as a backtrack and more as an opportunity. The issue is about ensuring campus cops remain “important team members in our schools,” Westlin said, while creating uniformity across school resource officers’ duties, their training requirements and accountability.

What she's referencing is the fact that police responded to the ban by removing 400 officers from schools. She wants cops back in schools for some reason, and she wants to give 150k tax dollars a year to police depts.

Along with removing restraint rules for school-based police and campus security staff, the pending legislation would allocate $150,000 this year to develop consistent, statewide training standards for school resource officers and require police to complete the lessons before working on campuses. The bill also seeks to clarify that school-based police officers should not be involved in routine student discipline.

Police won't go to school if they can't do that particular move, a deadly move that easily kills, on high school children. This ghoul is making the assumption we need or even want them there.

Ladies and gentlemen, i present to you the "Harm reduction party"

[–] nymwit@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Cedrick Frazier is in on it, too. For some reason he rates a picture while Bonnie Westlin doesn't. Presumably because of the comparisons the article/general press is making with these laws/Floyd and that Frazier is black. Saying anything about him being black in the article would be crass, but they'll just drop a picture and not have to write anything. "Ooooh look, he must be a hypocrite!" I mean he kinda sorta is maybe, but not because he's black but because the article says he was a champion of police reform after Floyd's murder and now is walking back a reform.

The money is supposed to go to training. Seems reasonable enough. They have a "Captain of Investigations Tanya Harmoning" going on in there about how the cops only know how to do things one way. Seems like it could be good if they learned a different way. There is a little more detail, too: "But even without a ban on prone restraints, he said that state law would continue to prohibit school-based officers from pinning students to the ground in ways that restrict breathing."

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

I despise that quote, because it is false on its face. The position they are unbanning is one that restricts breathing. I just saw a link on lemmy a few days ago about this very position and how dangerous it is.

As far as the money for training goes, i hate that too. Its ostensibly to train cops not to kill kids while using the move that we're now allowing them to do because they had a tantrum and quit when we told them they couldn't.

We don't need cops in schools, period, and paying for the privilege of having them back? Has me straight fucking pissed.

None of this ire is directed at you, mind you, youre great :D

load more comments (2 replies)