this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
111 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

59157 readers
2348 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm personally waiting for legal cases to do with the use of AI trained on code, and whether the licenses apply to it.

If they don't, our GPL becomes almost useless because it can be laundered but at the same time we can begin using AI trained on code we don't necessarily abide by the license terms of (maybe even decomps I don't know how it'll go). Fight fire with fire and all. So I'd maybe look into that.

If they do, then I'll probably still use it, but mainly with permissively licensed code, and code also under the GPL (as I use the GPL)

And in both cases, they'd be local models, not "cLoUd" models run by the likes of M$

Until then, I'm not touching it.