this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
433 points (99.1% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2139 readers
5 users here now

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Djinn@lemm.ee
433
Dakota Johnson on ‘Madame Web’ Blowback: “I’ll Never Do Anything Like It Again” (www.hollywoodreporter.com)
submitted 8 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/moviesandtv@lemm.ee
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“It’s so hard to get movies made, and in these big movies that get made — and it’s even starting to happen with the little ones, which is what’s really freaking me out — decisions are being made by committees, and art does not do well when it’s made by committee,” she added. “Films are made by a filmmaker and a team of artists around them. You cannot make art based on numbers and algorithms. My feeling has been for a long time that audiences are extremely smart, and executives have started to believe that they’re not. Audiences will always be able to sniff out bullshit. Even if films start to be made with AI, humans aren’t going to fucking want to see those.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well, this is the second bad franchise she has been in.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's a shame, because it's very easy to be typecast as an actor when you repeatedly star in flops, and while few directly criticise her performance in either movie, I imagine she'd be concerned that she'll be the first name on the list for lazy cash-grabs, and bottom of the list for anything she'd like to do.

It's why I question those that criticise her for criticising the movie. After all, this is her career, and if there were shenanigans that resulted in a poor movie that wasn't what she expected to come out, she should call it out.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s just so tough breaking in these days as the child of two famous actors.

[–] MrBusiness@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

She could embrace it and become another Nicolas Cage

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

50 shades is at least competently made trash, not designed by committee

[–] Bloodyhog@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It also brought in a handsome box office. Does not mean it is a good movie (it was properly horrible in my view, could not watch it, but some of the reviews were fun!), just that people with tastes different to mine exist in numbers. From what I can see about the new release, we won't be able to use this defence here.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 8 months ago

The movie franchise got worse as the book's author started to interfere more.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I never saw 50 shades (though if the premise appeals to anyone they should read some stjepan sejic, he did graphic novels in response to it that are informed by actual knowledge of the topic), but folding ideas’s reviews of them made them sound like a competently made piece of trash followed by two pieces of trash ruined by an artist and committee.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

The book is bad, the first movie at least lampshades a lot of the stupidity.