Free and Open Source Software

17916 readers

125 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

133

My Love-Hate Relationship With Lemmy – Gavi's Blog (jewy.blog)

submitted 8 months ago by gabe@literature.cafe to c/foss@beehaw.org

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I made a blog post discussing my biggest issues with Lemmy and why I am kind of done with it as a software.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why a new software though? Why not fork lemmy? Might as well call it Kilmister too. I just don't see why reinvent the wheel, especially since the issue is that of management and not technical.

[–] Lionir@beehaw.org 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The codebase is remarkably not fun to work with according to everyone I've talked to. The language (rust) is also not common for web services so many have no experience with it. These things made people want to start from scratch.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

@nutomic@lemmy.ml3•

I was a Java developer before starting to contribute to Lemmy. Didnt know anything about Rust, just wrote code and resolved compiler errors until things worked. Rust is definitely not as hard to learn as some people think.

Anyone who has worked in SE knows how massive of a red flag this is. Nutomic aint wrong on principle. But aint he massively wrong at the same time.

Kotlin is a replacement for Java. But boy oh boy are they different languages allowing different things in the same VM.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

The Lemmy codebase is incredibly idiosyncratic

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

Might as well call it Kilmister too.

Well done!