this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
48 points (91.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers
327 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
48
Brazil Piracy Concerns at USTR Follow MPA Anti-Piracy Deal Controversy (torrentfreak.com)
submitted 8 months ago by Bristle1744@lemmy.today to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Carlos Chelfo, Copyright Protection Coordinator at ANCINE, was instructed to review work with the MPA to ensure that, moving forward, the protection of Brazilian content would always take priority. The deal itself was terminated. And that’s why Brazil is causing such concern for the IIPA in the United States, and what prompted its comment to the USTR[...]

As it's expected from a Brazilian governmental agency. "Americans trying to dictate how other countries work" exhibit #2925.