this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
84 points (97.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8563 readers
570 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I assume the idea here is to fund independent devs as if it was a AAA title?

I kinda doubt that would make for better games. There are plenty of games with no budget that blow AAA games out of the water in every way other than how they look. Bigger budgets don't necessarily make better things. Especially when you give inexperienced teams huge boatloads of cash they don't necessarily know how to manage.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In many ways the budget creates the mediocrity. If your game costs 100 million then you can't afford to make a niche product. You need mass market appeal or it won't even break even.

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What I understood was that a large budget also demands lower risks and therefore designers target conservative game mechanics, derivative themes and money making schemes (e.g., micro transactions).

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

No budget means no deadline