this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
183 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We can only hope 🙏

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I could see it happening honestly. He refuses to pay his bills for critical infrastructure, Twitter is getting evicted from one of his main offices, and now there's a growing debacle with ads being shown with neo-nazi propaganda; if those ad companies start to pull out it's game over for Twitter, and possibly a good chunk of Elon's wealth.

[–] bruzie@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An office they didn't even inhabit. Read the crazy story from someone who was there: https://mastodon.social/@rodhilton/110561579833908574

tl;dr: Twitter had plans to build out a massive office to consolidate all the small crappy offices they had in Boulder, CO. Pandemic came along. Jack Dorsey says everyone WFH permanently. Nobody thought to cancel the build. Build complete. Grand Opening (but don't show the hundreds of empty desks). Elon acquisition. Payments not made. Court-ordered eviction of new office building that wasn't occupied.

[–] NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...what the hell? Why didn't Jack Dorsey cancel the project once he decided that Twitter would be remote work only? Reeks of incompetence tbh, seems like the company was already having leadership issues before Elon took over.

[–] Givesomefucks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the building was an asset during the sale...

On paper it was "smart" to have it there because it was a tangible asset. Long term it was a waste of money, but canceling would have been worse before the sale because it would have been an immediate loss affecting the price.

Just kicking the can down the road

[–] ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Man, the thread author is right, that office is gorgeous. What a monumental waste.

load more comments (1 replies)