this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
792 points (98.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
816 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 108 points 8 months ago (6 children)

When your employees are so efficient they start using their spare time to audit each other's efficiency on an industry-wide metric.

[–] noobnarski@feddit.de 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I have heard that its not too hard to start your own project when working at valve.

Maybe it will turn into their next game, or a new steam feature or it will get canned.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is that still accurate? Their employees handbook was legendary a decade ago, but since then there have been rumours that this isn't the case any longer, and that there were significant problems behind the scenes.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you can still work on whatever you want as long as GabeN wants it too.

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

I think that goes for most company structures

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago

I mean with that money printing machine and good reputation among users it's no doubt be cozy for devs to start stuff without having someone breath down their neck for costing too much money or too high of a risk.

load more comments (3 replies)