this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
41 points (97.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers
384 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
41
Court Temporarily Halts S.E.C.’s New Climate Rules | Two fracking companies had challenged requirements that some businesses disclose more information about the risks they face from climate change. (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The emergency stay granted by Fifth Circuit judges on Friday came in a case brought by two fracking companies, Liberty Energy and Nomad Proppant Services. “There is no clear authority for the S.E.C. to effectively regulate the controversial issue of climate change,” the two companies wrote in their petition. They were “arbitrary and capricious,” the two companies said, and violated the First Amendment, which protects free speech, by “effectively mandating discussions about climate change.”

The Fifth Circuit is where the law goes to be corrupted. All the consequential cases over the last few years had their start in the Fifth Circuit.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 8 months ago

Fifth Circuit is a rubber stamp for Conservatism and wealthy corporate interests, at this point.

Judge shopping needs to be stopped.