this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

3269 readers
65 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
  2. Has to be relevant to Canadian politics.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't usually agree with the CD Howe Institute, but

Other circumstances, however, are well within Canadian policy makers’ scope. Canadian living standards are stagnating. Weak capital investment is hurting productivity and incomes. Canadian businesses tend to stay small. Canadian governments rely relatively heavily on personal income taxes, with high rates that apply at relatively low income levels

isn't wrong.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

The problem is, the Howe institute isn't going to look at the logical alternative, which is punitive taxation on non-productive wealth, like real estate, finance and, well, cash hoarding in general.

They're sooooo close, though.