this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
93 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40198 readers
779 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
93
Simple authentication for homelab? (eviltoast.org)
submitted 8 months ago by johntash@eviltoast.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What's everyones recommendations for a self-hosted authentication system?

My requirements are basically something lightweight that can handle logins for both regular users and google. I only have 4-5 total users.

So far, I've looked at and tested:

  • Authentik - Seems okay, but also really slow for some reason. I'm also not a fan of the username on one page, password on the next screen flow
  • Keycloak - Looks like it might be lighter in resources these days, but definitely complicated to use
  • LLDAP - I'd be happy to use it for the ldap backend, but it doesn't solve the whole problem
  • Authelia - No web ui, which is fine, but also doesn't support social logins as far as I can tell. I think it would be my choice if it did support oidc
  • Zitadel - Sounds promising, but I spent a couple hours troubleshooting it just to get it working. I might go back to it, but I've had the most trouble with it so far and can't even compare the actual config yet
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Unchanged3656@infosec.pub 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Depending on what you are trying to do, Authelia does have OIDC in beta https://www.authelia.com/roadmap/active/openid-connect/

I use Authelia again since in beta it now supports multiple Pass/FIDO keys via the web interface, and it does work reasonably well.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago

OIDC does indeed work fine too.

I use it on nextcloud and immich and a few others.

You will be much more hard pressed to find apps that support SSO and oidc than oidc that authelia is broken on.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hmm I thought authelia could only act as an oidc provider, I didn't think it could allow logging in through a Google account for example?

I'll take a look at the docs again, thanks!

[–] Unchanged3656@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

After looking deeper into the docs they do not support and do not plan to support the Relying Party role. So it probably won't fit for this use case.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 1 points 8 months ago

Thanks for confirming, I just saw that as well.

I'm going to try some of the other solutions in this thread, but I might still come back to authelia and just ignore my requirement for having social login. I like the idea of sending someone a link and saying "Hey just log in with your google account" instead of having to create an actual user for them, but maybe I can use something else specifically for those cases.