this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
205 points (98.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
731 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Right. A modder’s work is useless without the game because it modifies someone else’s work.

A modder takes someone else’s work and modifies it for their own purposes. Here, a company took a modder’s work, which was based off their own work, and used it for their own purposes.

Should they be paid for it? Yes, I think so. Will they? I dunno, sounds like they removed it pretty quick.

The only point I’m trying to make is that they both used someone else’s work without permission. (I’m assuming the modder didn’t have permission because it’s EA)

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 6 points 8 months ago

You are continuing to perpetuate the misunderstanding that the modder releases a modified game, rather than just a mod.