this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
1054 points (96.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21311 readers
495 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    1054
    Are gun designs open source? (lemmy.world)
    submitted 8 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    354 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Even an RFID reader would be a bad thing, IMO. First and foremost, you have the issue of battery life; most people fail to check the batteries in their smoke detectors regularly, so I can't imagine people would remember to check the reader in their firearm. Secondly, given that many people that have guns have multiple guns, you would need some kind of sending unit--assuming that the firearm would be the reader, since the reader is going to be larger--that is either universal, or can be programmed and paired to multiple devices. Either one of those would still allow unauthorized users to steal your gun. Especially if they had something like a Flipper Zero that could read and modify RFID data.

    Adding on to this, you may have to shoot with your off hand, or in a position where the reader isn't close enough to detect the chip; then you have a no-shoot situation, which could potentially be deadly.

    I had to scan my credit card three times at the grocery store yesterday; the reader couldn't read my card. Now imagine that when someone is trying to carjack you.

    I would want smart guns to be at least as reliable as a 1911--which is not a reliable firearm--before I would go for them.

    [–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

    I don't think I would trust it in a reactive shoot circumstance either to be honest. I'm also not too worried about a pretty advanced cyber threat of someone both actvily attacking an RFID chip (a programable definetly adds added complexity factor to me too) and getting my firearm. Its more so if someone broke into my house and took my firearm they would have added difficulty using it or if someone is in my house, kids, guests, etc and they get ahold of it there is one added layer of safety.