this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8536 readers
736 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hillock@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I don't like this kind of ambition. It can only fail. BG3 was already big enough. Just make a game in similar scope and everything would be fine.

Phrases like:

I think there is some tech that we don't have yet,

And I don't know what the specs are on the next gen [of gaming systems] yet, but I hope that it's going to bring us closer.

Are very discouraging. And this easily could become the next Star Citizen.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

it's wordplay. the entire game is tiny and is about dwarves.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

I disagree. Imagine if people looked at DOOM and said “y’know what? This is good enough, we don’t need to push that envelope.”

And adding tech isn’t inherently bad. They are talking about gaming tech, not blockchain, JavaScript and brainfuck.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

They have a proven track record of releasing real games in a timely manner. Where the fuck does your comparison get any merit?