this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
185 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

86036 readers
4983 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
185
NASA needs your smartphone during April's solar eclipse (www.popsci.com)
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

A rotating spheroid will oblate when its centrifugal force generates enough inertia to slightly flatten it out into a more irregular, elliptical shape.

I didn't know inertia could be generated. I thought mass just had inertia. Could someone explain? Are they talking out of their ass or is that statement actually accurate?

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

~~I think whoever wrote it just used the wrong word because yes inertia is dependent on mass, not momentum~~

Okay I actually decided to check and I think it just a poorly written explanation of rotational inertia

A rotating spheroid will oblate when its centrifugal force generates enough ~~inertia~~ angular momentum to slightly flatten it out into a more irregular, elliptical shape.

If the shape also changes, this would mean distribution of that mass relative to the axis of rotation would also have changed, which if I'm reading this right, affects rotational inertia.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Thank you! I knew I wasn't crazy... 😬

[–] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Inertia is the tendency of objects in motion to stay in motion, and objects at rest to stay at rest, unless a force causes its speed or direction to change. from Wikipedia

So they're kind of just saying that once it picks up enough rotational speed.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you! I appreciate it. I had a hunch they were sloppy with the term "inertia", and this confirms it for me, assuming I'm understanding it correctly.

[–] prashanthvsdvn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

They are talking about Moment of Inertia. Inertia wrt to rotation changes with how they are positioned in reference to the spinning axis. Think slender bodies are easier to rotate compared to wider bodies with same mass. That’s what they mean when earth slightly flattens out its becoming less slender and more difficult to rotate