this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
240 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58173 readers
3945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
240
Scientists reconstruct Pink Floyd song by listening to people’s brainwaves (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by dan1101@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sound clip is pretty creepy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I did, and it’s absolutely incredible. Keep in mind that the audio was recorded by sticking electrodes on a person’s brain, no speakers or anything. The fact that it is recognizable as music is amazing, but the fact that you can actually hear individual words is totally mind-blowing.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's recognizable only if you know what it's supposed to be. I don't think anyone could hear that and say "hey, that sounds like Another Brick in the Wall". I feel like the brain fills in what's missing and almost forces it to match the same pattern in our head. So it's definitely cool, but still clearly a science in its early days.

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having not heard the song since I was maybe four, I was annoyed that they gave me the intended lyrics before I played it. I agree that most readers will be primed to hear it correctly despite sounding only new-age trippy on its own.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They didn't give the intended lyrics. They just provided the name of the song I believe. Which happened to also be the lyrics. The second clip is a little more compelling as it includes vocals, so with that, it's definitely interesting.

[–] deranger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s where I disagree, it’s not recognizable as music - at least not without prior prompting.