Technology

59135 readers

3816 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

371

The BBC Won't Use AI to Promote Doctor Who Again After Being Yelled at by Fans (gizmodo.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The backlash was immediate, but it didn’t stop the BBC from using text generated by LLMs—and purportedly checked and copy-edited by a human before approval—in two marketing emails and mobile push notifications to advertise Doctor Who. But now, the corporation will stop the experimentation entirely after a wave of official complaints pushed them to offer a response to concerned audiences.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] rikudou@lemmings.world -14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah, they were lunatics who thought machines would replace them. Guess what, machines are everywhere and people still have a job.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Large-language models and computer tools in general are different to traditional machines, to be fair. For every spinning Jenny that you make, you need people to make it, people to service it, and people to operate it. These people all have jobs now. For every piece of software you make, you only need the one team who originally develops it. From then, it can be replicated endlessly with no extra human input. You also only need one set of people to "service" it (bug fixes, updates etc.) for the entire world, rather than one per factory or workplace

(Also, I disagree with your premise and your assumption that jobs = good, but you probably don't want to hear about it and I don't want to type an essay :) )

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

I can actually agree that jobs = good is not a good metric, it's just what luddites thought and I didn't want to be inaccurate.

The rest of your comment I disagree with, I work in software development and it's simply not true. AI transforms the work people do, it doesn't replace it, software in general doesn't replace work, only transforms it.