this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
394 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
59402 readers
3593 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That will just make them more money as they can charge whatever they want for both
From Teams plus office 10 euros a month per user to Office alone 9 euros a month per user and Teams alone 5 euros a month per user.
Microsoft would never do that now, would they ?
Never!!! 🤪
Capitalism has a lot of problems, but the freedom given to a seller to set their prices to whatever they like and watch the buyer decide it is not a fair price and go buy from someone else is not one of them.
This is a win for everyone.
Are you familiar with the concept of a captive market?
Its only freedom if there's actual choice involved.
The scale at which these sales are made has nothing to do with the average consumer. Its just mega corps crunching numbers.
And that really only has to do with share prices, none of it trickles down to the actual workers.
This is just rich people having slap fights.
this is all well and good when we're talking about a properly elastic market (eg food)
however, the supply of hosted enterprise video conference software is extremely limited (teams, zoom, google meet) and the demand is extremely high
moreover, switching providers and reeducating the staff will also be highly expensive
you can't exactly go anywhere else, you just have to agree to whatever msft is doing
The problem with that is when a company like Microsoft has used and abused its position for such a long time that the only possible competition is another megacorp. No real choice there, only an illusion of choice.
If we clearly have to pay for.something, instead of it being wrapped into a license of so many things, I will push for us to take Zoom.
It just works better.
Annotating on screen is worth it alone, instead of trying to talk the screen sharer to what part of the screen you want to talk about.
I want:
The annotation is a killer feature I don't why others haven't added it yet
Pretty sure the only reason any org uses teams is because it's already bundled for free with office or Enterprise subscriptions.
Agreed
Teams also have great integration with SharePoint which simplified administration and usage.
I'm completely biases because I cannot find a si gle redeemable feature of SharePoint.... Hence, anything that integrates with SharePoint is just worse by doing so