this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
44 points (95.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
464 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
44
Johnson Outlines Plan for Ukraine Aid; His terms may include tying the aid for Kyiv to a measure that would force President Biden to reverse a moratorium on liquefied natural gas exports (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

LNG by sea is not really better than coal in terms of emissions and pollution.

It's absolutely awful. Biden was 100% right to put the kibosh on it. It's blood money to sell it and we know it. We're no better than Russia or Saudi Arabia if we rely on this money.

Nope. I consider this the same as refusing to give aid to Ukraine. It's a non-starter. We do not sell off the future of our planet just to satisfy some GOP donors' greed and idiocy in order to buy protection for an ally that deserves it without contingency.

The worst part is, he knows Biden is all Mr. Consensus and Compromise all day every day. He'll consider and maybe even agree to these terms. Which will basically be handing the next election to the Republicans if he does it, who will then promptly cut off all further Ukraine aid anyway.

There's no situation outlined here where GOP decisions do not lead to the annihilation of an ally democracy. What they want is for there to not be a Ukraine.