this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
53 points (89.6% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
379 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you mean the Star Trek stuff, though, then the specific terms for those are AGI

Even in Star Trek only Data, Lore (and Peanut-hamper) were intelligent, all the computers ran on what is being called 'AI' now. Massive DBs and search algorithms.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago

The ship's computer could whip up an AGI (Moriarty) in response to a simple command. The Federation later systematized this in the form of emergency holographic officers.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

Search algorithms are, depending on the specifics, potentially "ai" now. If we're tokenizing out vectors and running a straight match query (i.e. postgres full text search) that's not AI - that's just string matching. Some of the offerings get into NN guided or LLM powered.... these tend to suck though because they're unpredictable and inconsistent. That may just be the novelty of the technology though, we've had decades to work on small word exclusion and language specific dictionary mapping - it's possible the consistency will get up and, at least when it comes to searching, everything really good already uses weird heuristics so it's not like we can reason on why specific results are preferred, we just know they're consistent.