this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
136 points (97.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5257 readers
735 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
136
Just 57 companies linked to 80% of greenhouse gas emissions since 2016 | Analysis reveals many big producers increased output of fossil fuels and related emissions in seven years after Paris accord (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Note that this represents who extracted, rather than who burned. Responsibility for burning fossil fuels is much more broadly distributed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Thanks for the comment OP. We can hardly blame the companies we consume from.

Think of these megacorps as organisms. They're made up of people, like cells. Some of those cells specialize, turn into organs. Some organs direct the beast, most are merely support. The overarching goal is to survive and grow.

They're not taking so much as we are giving. WE ARE THE FOOD.

Do everything you can to stop feeding the beast. After all, the beast is only doing what's natural.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 7 months ago

You're not necessarily wrong, but it's also important to keep in mind that they spend billions on advertising to populations and bribing governments to make sure that we "need" to use their products

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago

We 100% can blaim them. Those companies activly block alternatives and try to destroy them. They put massive resources in lobbying, PR and so forth for that very purpose, while knowing full well what is going on in terms of climate change. They even transformed our political systems, to allow them to pollute for longer. We have the technology to go fully away from fossil fuels for decades and it keeps getting better. These companies are the reason we have not deployed more of them.

Obviously starving them is a good path, but I want to stab them too. We have to stop extracting and we have to stop consuming. Both has to happen and right now.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

People consume from what is available, the companies control that